It was great to speak with you on the phone the other day.
For the benefit of the rest, let me just explain that there were two types of entries: one for FAME and the other for past Eyeka CFEs including Coke Zero. The ones entered for fame received additional points because clearly, more effort had been put into those. The result however shows just how high the judges scored the non-Fame ones.
Eyeka was not part of the jury. We had a Creative Director from BBH, the CEO of Iris and 3 judges from the client side.
We know that this particular Call-for-Entry has not been as smooth sailing as the others, but we truly appreciate all your feedback and suggestions. We'll do our best to make next year's award much much better. :) [by cdceniza on Running across Singapore in 30 Seconds]
Tony, thanks for pointing that out. It was a typo error on our part when we announced the title. This video has always been 30 seconds so no changes to the title or its length were made at all. We'll be more careful next time! :) [by cdceniza on Running across Singapore in 30 Seconds]
This won the Advertising awards competition??? Haaaaaaa!! you cant be serious!!. This guy didnt even enter the initial competition, Has not ever entered any other calls for entries, and this Coke competition was only available to people in Singapore. Absolute Rubbish! I'll stay in Australia thanks where we have credibility, Talent and a repecable industry!!
[by warwick1975 on Running across Singapore in 30 Seconds]
Not surprising that a video that failed to follow the contest rules won.
Even the title was changed after winning, from 60 to 30 seconds. [by adb on Running across Singapore in 30 Seconds]
View all comments